Workshop detail header
Field note

Testing a Closeup Camera Setup

Tiny shiny parts are honest: the “better” closeup lens made everything harder, while the Canon 100mm just got on with the job. Process first, then gear.

Canon 100mm is the clear winner for now: it’s easier to frame, light, and actually use on tiny reflective parts. The Laowa 24mm can get closer, but it made everything too exact to be practical, so the next test will control the setup better.

Winner so far: the Canon 100mm.

I started with the Canon lenses I already had for closeups. Good baseline. Easy to frame. Easy enough to light.

Then I tried the odd one: the Venus Optics Laowa 24mm.

It focuses very close. That sounded useful. In practice, I could not get it to work.

Yes, it gets physically close to the part. But that made everything harder at once. Framing shifted. Light had nowhere to go. Depth of field was basically gone.

On small reflective parts, that fell apart fast.

The useful part of the test was not image quality. It was seeing what each setup demanded.

The Canon 100mm felt forgiving. The Laowa wanted everything exact, and I was not there yet.

I definitely underestimated this a bit. Tiny shiny parts do not give you much margin 😅

What changed

The goal now is a tighter test:

  • Same part
  • Same light
  • Same camera position

That should make the comparison real. Process first.

For now, the Canon 100mm is the closeup lens. The Laowa might become a special tool later. Right now, it is just making the job harder.

NOSTR:

npub1nvhq9vgkpahlugwcf3jsnpaq5lj3w3rk6lknnvf9r8h8ft2ja2asaqcn2a
npub1nvhq9vgkpahlugwcf3jsnpaq5lj3w3rk6lknnvf9r8h8ft2ja2asaqcn2a
Copyright 2025 The bitcoin watchmaker